Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Bolting Bolton

Jim has stolen my thunder (again), so I'll just copy & paste from him.

Why are the Dems using so many obstructionist tactics on Bolton?

1. The first is that the UN is the dems' last great white hope. The UN, packed with socialists, may enforce by treaty on the United States such legislation as gun control, abortion, gay rights, etc, that the dems can't get passed in the Congress or may be in jeopardy if Bush appoints enough 'strict interpretation' judges to the courts. It also legitimizes opposition to the War on Terror. Doing anything to upset the status quo in the UN is therefore not in their interests, and John Bolton promises to thoroughly shake up that corrupt and ineffective organization.

2. The second reason is that they are flexing their muscles to demonstrate that they can and will block any but the most liberal nominee to the Supreme Court. They fear that much of their socialist agenda will fall apart if justices are appointed who can't find a right to abortion in the First Amendment, or a right to gay marriage in the Fourteenth, or a prohibition against capital punishment in the Eighth. By picking on Bolton as they have the appellate court nominees, they are sending a signal to the White House that it had better be very careful who it puts forth to fill any vacancies on the Court.

3. The final and most important reason is that the dems are doing everything that they can to make George Bush a lame duck as soon as possible. There is an element of spite in all this; they hate him and want him to fail. However, they are also looking at 2008 and they want the dem nominee to be able to point back at the previous four years and claim that the Republicans did nothing about Social Security / prescription drugs / War on Terror / pensions / budget deficit / you pick the issue. Never mind that they will be the reason nothing gets done.

I don't know if any of our lefty Senators have read those documents (written by a group of dead, white men) called the Constitution & the Declaration of Independence. It states that we are a democracy, governed by representatives freely elected by the citizens of the United States of America. That means that if 51% of Americans vote for Republicans, a majority of the citizens agree with the views of that party, & therefore, the views of that party prevail in policy matters & vice versa.

Yes, democracy is a "tyranny of the majority", this was a looming concern for the Founding Fathers, that is why we have a Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights ensures that any minority, is free to speak, practice the faith of their conscience, broadcast his views in via the press, gather with like minded compatriots & run for political office. These rights ensure that the political discourse remains open to all. But, these rights do not include obstructing the majority party. The majority party, became what it is as a result of an expression of the will of the people, therefore, to obstruct the actions of the majority party is to obstruct the will of the people. That is not the way a democracy operates, that's a dictatorship.

Sad, isn't it. I don't understand how the Dems think they are helping themselves by aiding & abetting people who want to kill them. Atheists are infidels too, in fact, they get no protection what so ever. While I heartily believe in debate, I do not believe in shooting my self in the foot.

Comments:
Cool blog. However I am looking for info on Mesothelioma or Mesothelioma Lawyers. I would also like to find info on Asbestos and Asbestos Lawyers
 
Keep up the good work »
 
tramadol online can order ultram online - tramadol hcl for pain
 
Post a Comment

<< Home
|

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?